In some countries an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food. It is therefore necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Due to temp of life is increasing dramatically, some people have to eat unhealthy cuisines

such

as hamburgers, hotdogs and etc.

This

lead to

problem

Add an article

a problem

the problem

show examples

with health, because these type of meal have too many fats, preservatives and so on. In

this

,case it looks the government need to do some actions to solve

this

issue. And one of these the decision is increasing

tax

for

such

type of field. I my own opinion, I agree just partly with the former solution. On the one hand, fast food let people save time, and increasing

tax

for work

such

as KFC or MacDonald's it's mean that persons who have no time just will pay more money for the same food as before and they will continue eating it. Everyone knows statment

such

: Request creates proposal. So request for fast cooking will at all time.

On the other hand

, if the state will increase the

tax

it's mean that number of fatsfood points will decrease or at least new competitions will not be. Because there are full of different business in

this

field. It

also

depends on how much the government are going to increase the

tax

price, and where. Increasing

tax

it

Correct pronoun usage

apply

show examples

overlooks the real pressing matter, and there is a range of solutions, which each one can lead to different effects.

For instance

, the state can deny or change some type of ingredients in the products. Or another example is denying advertisements for these foods on TV

for example

. So in final ,

,

Change the punctuation

apply

show examples

conclusion it looks that in general make the high

tax

for fast food trade will not solve the problem. The state needs alternative or more complex ways to reach a good achievement.