These days the environmental issue is at the top of the agenda. Some people suppose the only way to resolve it is to refuse from the present style of living in the interest of future generations. I’m devoting
this
essay to reasoning why Linking Words
this
idea is not deprived of rationality.
To start with, the natural aspiration of people is to leave posterity and Linking Words
therefore
, to create the best conditions for surviving. Linking Words
This
is why I suppose making changes is a logical, reasonable, and, what is especially important, inevitable development for an animal with the highest level of organisation that man is. Linking Words
For instance
, so-called plastic pollution is an especially actual question. These days microplastic contains in drinking water, food and even air. According to Italian research, its pigmented particles were found in both fetal and maternal human placenta out. Despite the fact the exact health risk posed by plastic remains controversial and not yet fully understood, there are studies demonstrating undesirable influence upon the human endocrine system, provoked by Linking Words
such
a plastic component as BPA (bisphenol A). If its impact is not overrated, humanity seems to be in big trouble.
Linking Words
Besides
, not only are the products of human activity toxic but, they Linking Words
also
depend on finite resources. The present level of consumption is unsustainable due to the limitation of raw materials. Linking Words
For example
, it is predicted that fossil fuels will have run out by the end of the century. Oil can Linking Words
last
up to 50 years, natural gas up to 53 years. It follows that if the consumption and production do not reduce, the following generations will be left in the lurch.
To sum up, in my belief, people of the 21st century must give up their comfortable lifestyle for the sake of progeny. As a Latin proverb says, ”Your progeny will collect the fruits of your labour”Linking Words
varzavr