university education should be restricted to the very best academic students, rather than being available to a large proportion of young people. To what extend do you agree or disagree ?

Educational regulations have always been a highly controversial issue. It is often argued that it is much better to specify the registration to the genius only for higher education level rather than a great number of university candidates.

This

essay will discuss why I strongly disagree with

this

notion.

To begin

with, students have a tendency to enter university at a critical age of seventeen that makes them quite vulnerable. To explain, adopting a selective approach in university recruitment might hurt them severely affectionally and causes them to feel insecure compound with a plethora of adverse problems

such

as depression and lack of confidence.

Therefore

, if learners do not have the opportunity for experiencing higher education, their youth will be ruined emotionally and they are going to be under a huge amount of pressure.

Furthermore

, it is utterly ridiculous to put restrictions on enlistments' vivid rights of keeping up their studies. post-school years of education play an active role in flourishing educators' potentials and it should make room for them to develop their competencies by providing them with a vast range of either vocational training or subject diversity

such

as physics , business and sport. So, under no circumstances, is banning allowed to the educators. To conclude,

although

setting some restrictions in order to attract only the noblemen might be beneficial, I personally, strongly oppose

this

idea as it may lead to causing destructive effects on student's personalities and restrain them from acquiring novel skills in different fields of study