health regulations have always been
highlyCorrect article usage
show examples
controversial
issuesFix the agreement mistake
show examples
. It is often argued that due to the fact that market products carry
sugar
in ample amount and
consequently
they are
as the main reason of health diseases, it is better to be sold at staggering costs in order to discourage the consumers from buying which eventually leads to less
sugar
consumption.
This
essay will discuss why I partly agree with
this
notion.
To commence, along with
sedentaryCorrect article usage
show examples
lifestyle and lack of physical
,using a huge amount of
sugar
in a daily diet might exacerbate the health conditions and result in
Correct your spelling
show examples
severCorrect your spelling
show examples
illnesses
such
as Diabet and
hearthCorrect your spelling
show examples
attack. As
sugar
plays a key role in everyday servings including pasta and bread, it tends to be
toCorrect your spelling
show examples
unattainable to eliminate it from our food stock.
Therefore
, it could be reasonable to be taxed to restrain buyers from purchasing.
For instance
, If a bar of chocolate costs the same as a box of cheese, shoppers may
choseChange the verb form
show examples
the
Correct your spelling
show examples
laterCorrect your spelling
show examples
over the former as milk is a more nutrient meal .
As a result
,
this
policy may have cumulative benefits in a long run.
On the other
hand
, there is no shadow of a doubt that in
this
modern era , citizens are reluctant to be obliged to do an activity even though it brings
benefits.
Furthermore
, the
would not be liable to restrict the buyers' food options.
In other words
,
this
regulation might be the same as putting human
being'sFix the agreement mistake
show examples
will power under question which is neither socially acceptable nor recommended.
additionally
, it is believed that habitats enforcing to make decisions might not be able to live the life fully.
This
is evidenced by northern Korean's way of living.it has shown that the minority of one-thirds is content with the mandatory perks being granted by the government.
Thus
, people have a right to decide for their own life regardless of the consequences.
To sum up, despite the fact that several heart problems might spring from
sugar
consumption relating to market commodities , I reaffirmed my position that I partially agree with surging their prices as it has the advantage of protecting people from sicknesses on the one
hand
Remove the redundancy
show examples
hand
, while , it could be considered utterly absurd to interfere people's eating habit and command them,
on the other
hand
.