Some people think that because children find subjects such as mathematics and philosophy difficult, they ought to be optional instead of compulsory. To what extent do you agree?

Talking about the syllabuses at schools, some people assert that
subjects
of natural science should be optional rather than obligatory as some students find them challenging to comprehend. Others propose that studying logical
subjects
is momentous for the development of
children
. Personally, I firmly support the latter notion for a variety of reasons.
First
of all, studying natural science helps balance the development of the brain. The left hemisphere is
provenproved
Correct your spelling
proven proved
to dominate the brain while the other side is held the liability for imagination and creativity. Professors, who gain deep insight into the brain's function, tailor appropriate teaching styles in order to ensure the youngsters' perfect growth. As
children
are entitled to utilize both sides of their brains regularly, they can accelerate their intelligence and sensitivity in a balanced way. Taking infants as evidence, since the necessity of logical thinking entirely dawns on parents, they create favourable conditions for
children
to acquaint themselves with numbers from an early age. Another point to consider is that a number of companies and businesses require maths and philosophy’s scores in the applicant’s profile. Judges would appreciate applicants with outstanding performance at schools since these
subjects
’ results reflect information comprehensibility and the capability to accumulate knowledge. Not only can they easily habituate themselves to the professional working environment, but they
also
have prospects of boosting general productivity.
Moreover
, these logical
subjects
possess higher applicability than social ones due to the increasing requirement for technology. In conclusion, I believe that the compulsory of logical
subjects
in
children
's syllabus is undoubted due to the high applicability and whole development of youngsters. Schools should design appropriate instructional activities so that students can accumulate knowledge and arouse their interest in maths and philosophy.
Submitted by thanh.jenny on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: