Some people say that governments need to prioritize the treatment and management od diseases of the people in the community. Otherss say that it should pay attention to primary health care more. Discuss both of these views and give your opinion.

There are some individuals who are of the view that the government should allocate a greater amount of funding and put more importance on treating and managing the conditions of

people

Use synonyms

who are sick in the community.

However

Linking Words

, others argue that it is a more practical option for countries to shift their focus into improving the primary

healthcare

Use synonyms

system of the nation to benefit more

people

Use synonyms

. Those who support the opinion that countries should prioritize the treatment of

diseases

Use synonyms

in the community point to the fact that many are already afflicted with serious illnesses that require immediate attention from the government. With

this

Linking Words

, greater investment in supplying expensive medical equipment, procuring more advanced medications, and spending on the hospitalization of sick individuals need to be considered.

This

Linking Words

cannot solely be paid for by an individual or even one's family, so the government should come in and invest more in

this

Linking Words

level of

healthcare

Use synonyms

to tackle the

health

Use synonyms

issues that are confronted by

people

Use synonyms

and allow them to have a higher quality of life and longer life expectancy.

In addition

Linking Words

, several communicable

diseases

Use synonyms

should be the top priority of

governments

Use synonyms

, as they can evolve into a full-blown epidemic, which can cripple nations if not addressed.

Such

Linking Words

is the case with COVID, Ebola, SARS and many other deadly

diseases

Use synonyms

that require rapid contact tracing, isolation, and management to prevent their spread.

However

Linking Words

, some

people

Use synonyms

oppose

this

Linking Words

suggestion strongly and claim that it is better for

governments

Use synonyms

to appropriate a larger budget for primary

healthcare

Use synonyms

endeavours.

This

Linking Words

can save more money for nations in that these thrusts can ultimately prevent

diseases

Use synonyms

. Through simple campaigns ,

such

Linking Words

as providing

health

Use synonyms

advice, information dissemination, vaccination programs, and free

health

Use synonyms

screening,

governments

Use synonyms

can address the root cause of the problem and give a lasting solution to the

healthcare

Use synonyms

issues faced by many countries worldwide.

Furthermore

Linking Words

,

this

Linking Words

is a worthwhile investment since the initial outlay is significantly lower. There is no need for sophisticated equipment or medical apparatus for

such

Linking Words

primary

healthcare

Use synonyms

programs, and all

that is

Linking Words

needed is for

people

Use synonyms

to be encouraged to have a healthier diet and lifestyle.

Hence

Linking Words

, the return of an investment will be much faster and more greatly felt as there is certainly going to be an improvement in the overall

health

Use synonyms

status of the entire country if

such

Linking Words

measures are implemented. In summary,

although

Linking Words

there are legitimate reasons to believe that higher levels of care and greater funding would be required for managing the existing

health

Use synonyms

conditions of

people

Use synonyms

, making

this

Linking Words

problem a top priority, I do not subscribe to

this

Linking Words

view. In my opinion, it is better for

governments

Use synonyms

to prioritize

healthcare

Use synonyms

if only to have a more sustainable, affordable, and effective

health

Use synonyms

program for all

people

Use synonyms

to enjoy.