Formal examination are the only effective way to assess a student's performance. Continual assessment such as course work and projects is not a satisfactory way to do this. Do you agree or disagree?

It is often said that the most effective method to evaluate a student's performance is formal examinations ,

also

work

courses

and

projects

are dissatisfactory means to accomplish

this

goal. From my point of

view

Add a comma

,view

show examples

I completely disagree with

this

idea that formal examination is the only way to assess

students

.

Firstly

, one of the conspicuous reasons for the importance of doing course works and

projects

during the study is to achieve experience practically.

For example

,

students

may decide to improve their knowledge for the measures of being professional in the future. By performing some practical workshops

this

issue would solve quickly.

This

would help

students

to prepare for future occupations. Without any serious problem.

Also

, create professional workforces for the community.

Therefore

this

makes it clear course works and

projects

are more essential than formal examination.

Secondly

,another significant reason is to distinguish different talents.

For instance

, enforcing work

courses

could cause teachers would understand

students

who have the special capability in diverse activities.

This

would tackle the problem of perplexity in choosing a goal to follow.

This

is a quality that work

courses

have but formal examinations don't have. It becomes apparent that upbringing expert workforces would be possible merely with conducting

courses

and

projects

by

students

. To summarise ,I strongly believe that

courses

and

projects

that

students

are carrying out on them are more necessary and crucial. It is predicted that the dramatic number of subject specialists in the workforce will always be more than those who are undergoing formal examination.