Some people think that the Government is wasting money on the arts and that this money could be better spent elsewhere. To what extent do you agree with this view?

There is a debate whether a

country

that buys

arts

is a waste of resources while others proclaim that it should allocate its fiscal budget in different areas. I completely support the group that believes that

countries

should not be stoping purchasing

arts

. In

this

essay, I am going to illustrate why it is important for authorities to buy art.

To begin

with, the main reason why I believe that governments have to purchase

arts

is that

arts

consider as intangible assets.

Therefore

, it will never be a waste of money

this

is because assets can be liquidated easily. The relevant

arts

,

for example

, are considered a national treasure and

countries

must preserve their history, heritage, and identity.

Furthermore

, these days

arts

could be used in the law of court as proof for

countries

to draw their land border.

On the other hand

, another reason why I think that the government's official should support the idea of purchasing

arts

is that art attracts tourists.

Therefore

, tourism will boost the economy at large and will create jobs in the region.

Thus

, expanding a museum or preserving a historical area will lead to energizing the businesses around it.

Moreover

, protecting

arts

will enhance the

country

's image in front of the international communities because respect government that archive

arts

.The sustainable development goals (SDG),

for instance

, has considered

arts

as a historical heritage;

therefore

, if

countries

could not preserve them, the United Nation will give them an extra hand. In conclusion, I strongly believe that allocating a

country

's fiscal budget to

arts

is admirable behaviour and it will not be a waste of resources because it will protect the

country

's history and attract tourists.