Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, so protecting them is a waste of resources. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Everyone needs a

second

Linking Words

house which is surrounded by trees and completely away from the civilization so that, they can spend their holidays with their family members. Some people believe that it is completely pointless to save the wild creatures in

this

Linking Words

timeline. I strongly disagree with the above statement. To start with, the majority of the part is covered by the water and the remaining one is getting snatched by the citizens who build malls and various structures.

Moreover

Linking Words

, the population is significantly elevated to massive numbers.

For instance

Linking Words

,

although

Linking Words

technology has made life easier for people it has an adverse effect on animals and they are suffering because of it.

Hence

Linking Words

, if these species are lost,

then

Linking Words

it would create an imbalance in the animal ecosystem.

Furthermore

Linking Words

, each species of the animal kingdom plays a vital role and it is completely dependent on another animal to survive itself. If wild creatures are finished from the latest century

then

Linking Words

automatically humans will go through a transformation and that would be terrible.

For example

Linking Words

, in the past, cancer was a deadly disease but now wild animals namely-sharks, and snakes have contributed enormous knowledge to

this

Linking Words

medicinal branch.

Thus

Linking Words

, wild creatures must be protected inside proper sanctuaries where they could spend their entire life in a peaceful manner and not in zoos. In conclusion, we must try to save every wild animal from getting extinct as they are so vital to our nature. We should feel responsible to ourselves not to let any species be lost forever.