The world should have only one government rather than a national government for each country.Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages?

There have been suggestions that the

world

should be under the rule of a single

government

rather than being ruled by regional governments.

Although

benefits that would result from

this

good idea, I am convinced that there are much more drawbacks compared with benefits. On the one hand, in an international

world

, many serious problems that all nations currently struggle with,

such

as climate change or the outbreak of Covid-19, could be solved. To be precise, a single

government

could set up strict legislation and force all citizens to get vaccinated against Covid-19.

Also

, if pollution legislation were to be maintained at a

world

level, the rules would be equally applicable everywhere.

As a result

, many pollution problems will be no longer possible.

On the other hand

, when the

world

comes under one umbrella, it

also

brings about troubles.

Firstly

, federalism can create oppositional competition. Because each community can create its own set of laws and rules in a system of federalism

then

the structure can create unwanted competition for resources.

For example

, the

government

might offer a significant tax break to a company that encourages them to place offices in one location and not another.

Secondly

, federalism is an expensive system of

government

since a lot of money is spent to maintain the central

government

and all of its component units.

Thus

, it is often said that only rich countries can afford it, which leads to the gap between rich and poor states widening. In conclusion, a single

government

for the entire planet could help resolve global issues but

this

trend

also

causes many serious conflicts which are hard to find immediate solutions

.

Change preposition

to.

show examples