Government investment in the arts, such as music and theatre, is a waste of money. Governments must invest this money in public services instead. To what extent do you agree with this statement?? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own experience or knowledge

Art

fundings have always been a highly controversial issue in different countries. It is often argued that allocating finance to public

welfare

systems could be more beneficial rather than

art

-related activities

such

as movies and music. So the government should take action more wisely on

this

particular issue .

This

essay will discuss the reason I partly agree , disagree with

this

belief. To commence, there is no shadow of a doubt that

art

is an integral part of any nations' culture because of two reasons. The

first

and foremost is the aesthetic aspects which indicate the delicacy of life and it affects the community tremendously. Take Beethoven as an example, without his masterpiece, the torturous life of that time would have been intolerable. Another reason is the intricate correlation between

art

and history.

In other words

, if there were not adequate artistic references

such

as poets, paintings, music and sculptures, there would have not been a reliable source of historical references which make it unattainable to gain access to the lifestyle of our ancestors.

on the other hand

, with the increasing population around the globe, there has been a pressing need

to

Change preposition

for

show examples

substantially more public systems. Undoubtedly, the government should buckle down and it tends to specify a great amount of budget on these establishments

such

as health

welfare

rather than

art

galleries . Clearly, Having a wide range of

welfare

health organizations will eventually lead to having a happier society. Ultimately, the more funding, the more community centres which not only do the local take advantage of but

also

the government would be more content. In conclusion,

although

many prioritize spending money on the community

welfare

system to the

art

issues, I reaffirm my position on partly agreeing, disagreeing as both investments are lucrative for the society either spiritually or physically.