Most artists earn low salaries and should therefore receive funding from the government in order for them to continue with their work. To what extent do you agree?

Thereupon, nowadays it is questioned if artists should receive funding from the government due to their low salaries. In my opinion, eventually, the state has to help either artists or others without enough income.

Furthermore

Linking Words

, according to

this

Linking Words

, receiving funding could, in some way, be resolving the problem but,

nevertheless

Linking Words

for a short-time period.

For instance

Linking Words

, the government should create opportunities for them to show their art,

such

Linking Words

as exhibitions, art galleries and other sorts of activities.

Besides

Linking Words

,

for example

Linking Words

, if museums were for free and with better publicity, the state could

also

Linking Words

indirectly be funding the authors and, at the same time, promoting culture.

Moreover

Linking Words

,

on the other hand

Linking Words

, I do not agree that artistic professions should be treated with more privilege than others. As with, in the meantime, some could think that being an artist is like having a hobby and it is no actual work. In

this

Linking Words

perspective, they would need to find another job that allows them to pay for their daily lives and pursuing with their art by the side. To summarize,

in other words

Linking Words

, in my point of view, it is a shame that artistic work has so little value these times. Undoubtedly, society should be more interested in culture and the most influential people serve as an example.