Some people think that developing countries need financial help from international organizations to continue their development. Some people argue that practical aid or advice is more useful. Discuss both views and give your opinion?

It seems that the question of whether financial help from multinational institutes would benefit developing countries or not is a vigorous debate. Whilst funding undoubtedly facilitates eliminating poverty in these countries, I would maintain that other practical
aid
should not be underestimated since it plays a vital role in supporting them. On the one hand, it is understandable why a handful of international bodies prefer to give funding to poorer nations. With
this
relief, the communities, which endure poverty, famine and other severe problems, would have a chance to alleviate
such
tremendous issues. Take Nepal
for example
. Nepal, which is infamous for lacking food, accommodations, basic healthcare system, can enhance its citizens’ standard of living by distributing food, building farewell houses and hospitals.
Furthermore
,
this
money could be used to develop heavy industry or ecotourism with safari, which leads to making way for sustainable development there.
This
kind of support,
therefore
, enable those countries to get out of impoverishment.
On the other hand
, in a developing nation with complicated problems, more well-rounded approaches seem to be essential. At
first
glance, money
aid
without accountability requirements presents a risk of corruption, which turns out to be unable to support underprivileged people.
Moreover
, due to the lack of a skilled workforce and good national policies, it is a fair suggestion that foreign
aid
should involve sound policies with more hands-on help.
In other words
, other practical
aid
which includes supporting
aid
workers, directly industrial investment, public health programmes would be in need. In conclusion,
although
financial
aid
from international organizations can help developing regions shake off their drawback to some extent, I would maintain that other practical help is far more effective.
Submitted by truongt.thunu on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Include an introduction and conclusion

A conclusion is essential for IELTS writing task 2. It is more important than most people realise. You will be penalised for missing a conclusion in your IELTS essay.

The easiest paragraph to write in an essay is the conclusion paragraph. This is because the paragraph mostly contains information that has already been presented in the essay – it is just the repetition of some information written in the introduction paragraph and supporting paragraphs.

The conclusion paragraph only has 3 sentences:

  • Summary
  • Restatement of thesis
  • Prediction or recommendation

Example:

To summarize, a robotic teacher does not have the necessary disciple to properly give instructions to students and actually works to retard the ability of a student to comprehend new lessons. Therefore, it is clear that the idea of running a classroom completely by a machine cannot be supported. After thorough analysis on this subject, it is predicted that the adverse effects of the debate over technology-driven teaching will always be greater than the positive effects, and because of this, classroom teachers will never be substituted for technology.

Start your conclusion with a linking phrase. Here are some examples:

  • In conclusion
  • To conclude
  • To summarize
  • Finally
  • In a nutshell
  • In general

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: