Some governments spend a lot of public money training up individuals to be successful in international sporting events. Some people believe that this money should be spent on things that will benefit the general public instead. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Nowadays, there are some

countries

that have a specific policy for sports achievement. In fact, they devote a lot of

money

to it to be able to get

medals

,

however

other nations believe that it is better to spend

money

on the general public promotion.

This

essay will analyse these two mentioned scenarios while I strongly agree with the

first

attitude. On one hand, numerous developed

countries

such

as the USA, the UK, Canada, China and stuff like that have a strong program in order to encourage athletes to get

medals

for their community. Unfortunately, we witness a climbing number of public especially

third

world

countries

have not any special training for their athletes and

as a result

, they do not have physical strength. Based on these country policies, it is wasting

money

to spend on sports competition. But in the

first

world

countries

, governments consider a lot of

facilities

and high-level international training and tell sportsmen if they try hard to win in international games like Olympic or Fida World Cup, they will earn a million dollars. So, they would be definitely motivated by their governments. In most cases, they won a climbing number of championships

medals

, but

this

policy does not just have benefits for individuals but has multiple times benefit for

countries

.

This

means as national teams or individuals attain to accomplishment, a lot of

money

will enter to these

countries

, so the financial resources become stronger and they will surely be able to promote the level of public

facilities

like transportation, education , health and things like that.

On the other hand

, some

countries

try to improve their public items without spending

money

on sporting competition due to the fact that their athletes have low-level talents and

also

the

money

they spend is more than the

money

they earn via international

medals

.

Therefore

, they spend all financial resources for general

facilities

improvement

however

the

first

countries

reach a greater level of promotion (about five times greater). By the way of conclusion, in

this

essay I evaluated two different attitudes about spending

money

on international sporting competitions, the

first

is allocating great

money

on these events and the

second

is considering

money

just for public

facilities

. From my strong point of view, investing in international competitions is more logical than the other policy.