University education should be free for all students. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Education

is the root of an individual's development in life. Some

people

believe that tertiary

education

should be free for pupils.I agree with

this

statement and will

further

discuss it in subsequent paragraphs. To commence with, free university

education

will benefit all sections of

society

.

Firstly

, students who are incapable to pay huge expenses of institutions will get access to

further

studies and

this

will impact their whole family to a great extent. There is a lot of wealth gap and inequality among

people

due to various reasons,

this

change will enact equality in the

society

,

Remove the comma

apply

show examples

because more deserving candidates will get proper studies as they want.

Secondly

, deserving candidates will

additionally

help in the nation's economy, and bring change in

society

with an adequate

education

. For ,instance Abraham Lincoln himself was born to impoverished parents but with the help of

education

, later he became president of the United States of America.

On the contrary

, free tertiary studies for all

also

have has some downsides.

Firstly

, if the government will provide

education

to everybody

then

it can become a burden on the taxpayers of the country. The government will put pressure on the rich

people

to pay more taxes. Funds that can be used for sectors like health, research and housing, will be compromised due to

this

reason.

Secondly

, the quality of

education

will

also

decrease due to

people

who are not even interested would behaving poorly and creating an imbalance in class decorum. Poor quality of

education

will lead to a poor quality outcome. To conclude, there are a lot of advantages of free university

education

for students and countries

although

with some disadvantages but I still believe that it should benefit the whole

society

in long term.