In the future all cars, buses and trucks will be driverless. The only people travelling inside these vehicles will be passengers. Do you think the advantages of driverless vehicles outweigh the disadvantages?

A future filled with driverless
is an inevitability. In my opinion, though there are concomitant moral risks, the practical import for
Add an article
the health
show examples
a seismic shift will be positive on the whole. Critics of
trend suggest that machines should not be responsible for the potential loss of human life.
argument rests on the fact that when there is an accident involving humans, it is possible to either assess blame and assign punishment or accept that human error played a role.
In contrast
, an individual severely injured as the result of a collision caused by a machine may justly feel that all human autonomy and free will is absent from their fate.
is analogous to a natural disaster with the crucial distinction being that humanity has engineered the situation. It is human nature to prefer to control a situation rather than surrender the outcome to an autonomous machine. Proponents of automated
on the other hand
, argue the tangible ramifications concerning public safety. The evidence overwhelmingly suggests that driverless
cause fewer
than humans. The reason for
is that humans are prone to errors related to fatigue, distractions
as smartphones, and, in some cases, altered states. Machines might experience the occasional technical error,
, they are far more consistent
by comparison
. In fact, the few
that have occurred with automated
were the fault of human drivers. If all cars were driverless,
would enable a greater level of sophistication that could, theoretically, all but eliminate automobile
. In conclusion, though many
will occur without human agency playing a role, safer roads fully justify
innovation. Companies and consumers must be wary of the influence of automation while
embracing its most transparent benefits.
Submitted by veranendang12 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • driverless vehicles
  • advantages
  • disadvantages
  • increased safety
  • reduced traffic congestion
  • improved efficiency
  • accessibility
  • disabled
  • elderly
  • job displacement
  • privacy concerns
What to do next:
Look at other essays: