In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport. discuss both these views and give your opinion.

There is a huge debate between policymakers about how should we allocate a regime

budget

which led them to be divided into two groups. The

first

one

believes that it is vital to spend money on the

railway

infostructure, while the other believes that that

budget

should be directed to the public

service

.

This

essay discusses both sides of

this

argument and why I believe that it is wise to spend a national

budget

on services

such

as buses fiscally. On

one

hand, there is the group that advocates spending money on

Add an article

a

show examples

utility like trains. There are many reasons why

this

group has

this

belief is because

this

group tend to see policies at the macro level.

Additionally

, when someone a new village it is important to consider the notion of how to provide

this

town, village, or even island resources.

Thus

, it is extremely crucial to plan its entries and exists

this

is because that land is part of a sum of lands. In fact,

this

is the main reason why the founding fathers of the

US supported

Add a hyphen

US-supported

show examples

the bill of building the national

railway

.

Moreover

,

railway

lines could support a

country

economically

this

is because it will generate profit, and that's mean that

this

money can be directed to another area. The US

railway

,

for instance

, has contributed drastically to the US economy where it played a huge role in increasing the US's gross domestic profit (GDP).

On the other hand

, there is a consensus that thinks a

country

resources have to be spent on public

transportation

. There were several reasons why

this

side has

this

viewpoint, and

one

of them is that investing in public

service

would attract visitors from all over the world. From my point of view, I do believe that when people will travel to a new

country

to spend their holiday, they tend to search on that

country

transportation

. London,

for example

,

one

of the reasons why families prefer to travel London is because you do not need to rent a car or order a taxi

this

is because it has a good public

service

.

Secondly

, investing in the public sector would attract investors to invest in

such

a

country

this

is because businessmen usually prefer to invest in countries that have allocated their

budget

into the public

service

.

Also

, developing a regime of public

transportation

will have increased

a

Remove the article

apply

show examples

government revenue. In conclusion, I believe both sides have merits. On balance,

however

, it is my opinion that we should have constructed a fiscal policy that would enhance public

transportation

.

This

is because it will energize the tourism industry as well as generate profit.