Without capital punishment (the death penalty) our lives are less secure and crimes of violence increase. Capital punishment is essential to control violence in society. To what extent do you agree or disagree to this opinion?

At present time

crime

and violence in society is on the rise and people are looking for acceptable but strong enough measures, which can control and eradicate

crime

without eradicating

criminals

, one offered solution is capital punishment which in its use will erase

crime

and

criminals

so all clear but I only partially agree with the death penalty and elaborate

further

in

this

essay. Of course , controlling

crime

and violence is the biggest challenge for law enforcement bodies in the era of guns , drugs as well as hate

crime

which contribute 90% of crimes,so there is the call from every corner of society for the strongest measures to bring those crimes down, some advocate for extended imprisonment for repeat offenders and for those,who commit grievance

crime

,but

this

is not working for everyone because there are chances of meeting same minded people and come out after their jail period and give birth to organised

crime

which is worst expected. so in final say some come up with capital punishment which goes live for life or if counts of the

crime

beyond social acceptance

then

such

criminals

will be awarded the death and at ,present it is normal rule for some countries in U.A.E. , it looks cruel but works great in controlling

crime

. In developed ,democratic countries advocates of human rights are raising the issue of human rights of life ,even for

criminals

so its use is only a debate issue and

such

penalties are not practical. In ,

the

Correct article usage

apply

show examples

conclusion in my personal opinion it is better to have capital punishment for some cruel and repeat offenders who do not show any remorse for their

crime

and when there is no chance of changing their criminal nature.