homes are very known in Europe, and especially in Britain. Many elderlies choose to spend the
chapter of their lives with same-age peers. The luxury of those houses come at a great cost, since it involves, accommodation, nurses, food, and activities, which is quite high. Some argue that those fees should be covered by the government as part of the pension plan, while others believe that
treatment should be solely handled by the family. In
essay, I will analyze both perspectives, and emphasize the importance of having
service freely accessible to everyone, as part of paid taxes, and especially for modest
.
Throughout their career, British citizens pay high taxes, covering health insurance, schooling, and pension. Certainly,
homes should be covered by those fees, as it is becoming a true necessity in today's world. The reason behind
is that most people are
travelingChange the spelling
show examples
outside their cities to seek better job opportunities. Unfortunately,
will leave the parents alone, with no one to care for.
, a
house would be the most suitable alternative. As a personal example, we are a small family of 4, Mom, Dad, my brother - who is living abroad, and I. A few years back, I have received an amazing job offer, and I had to travel to Luxembourg for 3 years. While discussing with my parents, they preferred to stay in a
home while I am abroad, so there is someone to take care of them.
InChange preposition
show examples
the other hand, households that are most in need of
service are modest and poor ones. Why? simply because rich
can easily afford to get in-home nurses, and provide the essential care of elderly members.
, taxation should take into consideration the annual income of a certain family, so less fortunate
should pay way less compared to others with a high wage.
, my aunt who is living in France is considerably rich,
, her 2 daughters decided to keep her at home, and brought her all
needed for a respected stay,
as a medical bed, a physical therapist, 3 nurses, and someone to read her stories from time to time.
is clearly the better choice when financials are at hand.
To conclude, home retirements should be considered as a legitimate right for everyone, equally and freely accessible to all
, with no differentiation of their social level. But, the cost of
service should be settled through a well-thought taxation schema, where privileged
pay higher taxes than middle
.