Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment; only governments and large companies can make a difference. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

"
Individuals
can do nothing to improve the
environment
; only governments and large
companies
can make a difference". My feeling towards
this
statement acts as a double-edged sword. On
one
side, with my personal thoughts, I strongly disagree with the statement but on the other, it might seem very logical that it is actually how
this
neoliberal
world
is running. My
first
reason to disagree with the following statement is that I strongly believe in the domino effect of the immensely small
change
that can lead to a massive big
change
. An individual's impact on the
world
is negligible as it is only
one
thing done by
one
person
from the 6 billion other
individuals
existing on the
planet
that could be doing many other things and most probably, the majority of these 6 billion other
individuals
are harming the
planet
one
way or another. On paper, the action of
one
person
seems totally useless.
However
,
this
one
person
doing something positive is
one
person
less doing something negative.
This
one
person
becomes the beacon of that positivity that the
world
needs. If that
one
individual's actions
change
the idea of two more
individuals
and if
this
changing of positive ideology runs for 10 cycles, we will have around 2000
individuals
having a positive impact in the
world
which is about a small village walking towards the welfare of
this
planet
.
Furthermore
, I was enlightened by the power of 1% from a book called "Atomic Habit". The book beautifully illustrated that 1%
improvement
every day for a year is an overall
improvement
of nearly 37% from the initial point. That's the power of an individual per cent that can lead to nearly halfway resolving an issue.
Nonetheless
, it is certain that our
planet
is deteriorating; from the ruins in the ocean spills to the devastating deforestation of lands. All these scars being inflicted on
this
planet
is only due to a very narrow-minded thought process - to extract as much as resources possible in the short run while having faith that all the consequences will be handled in the future in the long run. Truth to be told, sometimes
this
faith doesn't exist. Large
companies
continue to dent the health of the
planet
for mere profits that could be gained. There are promises made,
such
as donations and plans to suture the damage, but it is all a front-cover to avoid tax and avoid a bad reputation towards the company. The true motivation towards the fixture should have been to save the
environment
.
However
, that very motivation is missing as it will cause a vast amount of money.
Hence
, it is in the hands of the
individuals
to bring an
improvement
to the
environment
.
This
will bring a small
change
but
this
small
change
can lead to a bigger
change
over time. In
this
neoliberal
world
, we all have our choices and
hence
, the government and big
companies
have chosen to make the greatest amount of money possible by choosing a path
that is
doing the least damage to the
environment
, ignoring that it is still harming the
environment
. If the government and large
companies
, changes their priorities to help the
environment
, there will be a big difference made in the
improvement
of the conditions in the
environment
.
However
, it is not the case and
therefore
, it is in the hands of the
individuals
to make the small changes, hoping it will be significant enough to bring a bigger
change
.
Submitted by Zinnat Baygam on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Support ideas with relevant, specific examples

Examples make your writing easier to understand by illustrating points more effectively.

Examples, if used properly, not only help you get higher marks for ‘Task Response’ but also for ‘Coherence’.

When giving examples it is best to put them after your main idea or topic sentence. They can be used in the middle of supporting sentences or they can be used to start a new sentence. There is no rule for where exactly to give examples in essays, logically they would come after your main idea/topic sentence or just after a supporting sentence.

Linking words for giving examples:

  • for example
  • for instance
  • to illustrate this
  • to give a clear example
  • such as
  • namely
  • to illustrate
  • take, for example

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • environmental awareness
  • sustainable practices
  • renewable energy
  • carbon footprint
  • waste reduction
  • conservation
  • ecosystem
  • pollution
  • climate change
  • responsibility
  • leadership
  • legislation
  • investment
  • collaboration
  • systemic change
What to do next:
Look at other essays: