News stories on TV and in newspapers are very often accompanied by pictures. Some people say that these pictures are more effective than words. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Images are used extensively on public media,

such

as television and

newspapers

to increase audience engagements. With

this

striking use comes the opinion that illustrations appear more impactful than plain

words

.

Although

written language weighs more informative, I honestly believe that

pictures

generate more attractiveness overall.

Words

have the ability to convey

information

and message but in a boring way. It means that the more

words

contained in stories and

newspapers

, the more impatient viewers would be.

Instead

of attracting more people,

this

way of conveying

information

is perhaps only preferred by the old generation, which would limit the access of other potential customers.

Nhandan

Correct your spelling

Chandan

News,

for instance

, provides few images compared to other Vietnamese remaining

newspapers

, significantly showing a small amount of audience and low profit.

Words

appear to scarcely stimulate the audience’s captivation.

Otherwise

,

pictures

seem to be more vivid and make comprehension easier. In simple

words

,

pictures

can effortlessly grab the reader’s attention and convey

information

. without reading entirely the content of

newspapers

or stories. By adding illustrations to the articles, the content creators can

also

bring the

information

to children even though they cannot understand the word’s meaning. The typical case in

this

point appears in BBC News, which is popularly accompanied by

pictures

.

Pictures

resource contributes to the large attraction that approaches a wide range of audiences. In recapitulation, either

words

or

pictures

can convey the

information

to people, among which the illustrations show a more powerful impact.

Hence

,

pictures

can generate more attraction to audiences of a wide range.