Some people think sending criminals to prison is not an effective way to deal with them. Education and training are better. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

There are controversial perspectives heating a debate over how to tackle

criminals

. While some claim that forcing offenders to jail is a useful

way

to punish them, the opponents believe that improving the educational system and training is more effective. While each has its own perks, I would contend that it is ideal to combine both mentioned factors. Without a shadow of a doubt, imprisonment is the best

way

to deal with lawbreakers. Contemporarily, ever-growing

criminals

are a threat to the safety of the citizens, which lead to the deterioration of social quality.

Therefore

, placing perpetrators in jails is a stopgap remedy to prevent hazardous circumstances for people.

For example

, serial killers must be punished for a long time in a miserable cell, and simultaneously be isolated with other relationships to stop the rate of mortality for the country.

Thus

arresting

criminals

is an effective method to address them. While the redeeming features of inflicting lawbreakers are widely acknowledged, it is unfair if those of improving education and training are ignored. A reason is that youngsters can spawn illegal activities due to a shortage of academic awareness and adverse impacts on their life.

This

situation leads to an increasing rate of juvenile delinquency,

then

amending schooling and general training is a useful

way

to deteriorate

criminals

.

For instance

, some robbers trigger detrimental situations for the citizens,

however

, after learning the rules of the country, they can distinguish between legal and illegal

behaviors

Change the spelling

behaviours

show examples

.

Finally

, some people who break the law should be taught to avoid a guilty life. To conclude, the combination of the two mentioned elements is a suitable

way

to worsen perpetrators.