Some people think sending criminals to prison is not an effective way to deal with them. Education and training are better. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

There are controversial perspectives heating a debate

whether

Change preposition

on whether

show examples

to cope with perpetrators. While sending offenders to jail is valid to some extent, I would contend that training and educating criminals is better. On the one hand, providing vocational training and education play a paramount role in dealing with criminals.

This

is because once they intend to break the law, they will have to think about whether it is worth the risk.

For instance

, if they are well-educated and perceived as having ethical values by the government, they will give

the

Correct article usage

a

show examples

second

thought before taking

actions

Fix the agreement mistake

action

show examples

. Meanwhile, if they are not properly trained, they will be imprisoned. With

this

method of treatment, offenders can have a chance to earn a living and the world will decrease the crime rate.

On the other hand

,

although

educational programs are widely acknowledged, putting

law breakers

Correct your spelling

lawbreakers

show examples

behind bars is a necessary method for certain classifications of crimes. People who committed crimes

such

as drug addiction, robbery or even murder have to be arrested to keep them away from citizens.

For instance

, if we come home late from work and it's late at night, robberies or some addicts may occur and in a few cases lead to serious irreversible consequences. After all, imprisonment is

also

an essential way to prevent them from contaminating ordinary people to avoid latent danger. In conclusion, I believe that job training and educational systems are more important for criminals so that they can correct their mistakes.