Some people think sending criminals to prison is not an effective way to deal with them. Education and training are better. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

There is a controversial statement heating a debate over whether law-breakers should be well-educated and trained while being kept in captivity. Personally, I consider myself an advocate of

this

perspective due to the redeeming features that it might bring to

offenders

as well as the whole

society

. It is evident that providing education and training courses while being captured in jail can enormously do wonders for

offenders

, especially after they are released. It is by no means easy for a perpetrator to reintegrate into

society

and land a decent job after a long time being imprisoned due to their criminal record and skill level, and

hence

increase the rate of repeating convict crimes again.

Therefore

, offering training programmes can prevent

this

phenomenon by facilitating

offenders

with essential insights and different sets of skills so they can find an appropriate job after they are sent back to the community. Without a shadow of a doubt, education and training are more viable methods to cope with criminals. While the merits that education and training programs bring to

offenders

are widely acknowledged,

society

is benefited as well. During the serving time,

offenders

live mostly rely on the national coffer which is paid for by ordinary citizens. By giving them sufficient skills to earn their own income, it will not only reduce the financial burden to the whole nation but

also

encourage them to become productive members of

society

. In the long run, it can reduce the crime rate in that country which may act as a precursor for the prosperity of a nation. Notably, well-educated and trained

offenders

can

also

bring favourable impacts to the community. To sum up, I strongly believe that educating and training law-breakers is tremendously beneficial for their reintegration as well as

society