Nowadays, a number of people own mobile
phones
though they cause different ailments on the users. It is said the government must introduce laws to restrain ownership of cell Use synonyms
phones
to those who use them for work purposes. I totally disagree with Use synonyms
this
assertion. The essay below will discuss Linking Words
this
view at length.
Linking Words
First
and foremost, we are living in a world where almost everything is digitalised and most companies need mobile Linking Words
phones
to sell their services. If the workers are restricted Use synonyms
then
it would affect the company goals. Linking Words
Therefore
, I am against the idea of introducing laws on the usage of mobile Linking Words
phones
. Use synonyms
For instance
, there are network companies Linking Words
such
as Birdie (Hong Kong), if their services are restricted Linking Words
then
the public will be affected as they depend on them.
Linking Words
Secondly
, on the issue of health, there are several types of equipment Linking Words
such
as Linking Words
the
reading glasses designed to protect the eyes of cellphone users. Using protective clothing and taking precautions when using Correct article usage
apply
phones
may help reduce its effects on people's well-being . Use synonyms
Hence
I disagree that mobile Linking Words
phones
ownership should be restricted. Use synonyms
For example
, the Econet company in Zimbabwe provides all their workers with reading glasses and protective gloves since they repair mobile Linking Words
phones
.
In conclusion, the essay above disagrees with the opinion that the government should introduce laws restricting the ownership of mobile Use synonyms
phones
by workers. Use synonyms
This
is because companies cannot survive without cellphones as they mostly depend on them for communication. These and other issues have been discussed in the above essay.Linking Words