It is not wise for an industry to replace its experienced but old workers with new and young yet inexperienced individuals. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

To begin

with, I partially agree with the statement it is not wise for the

industry

to hire young yet inexperienced individuals to substitute its experienced but old

workers

.

First

, both categories of

workers

are integral to the

industry

to prosper

further

.

For example

, inexperienced individuals need guidance from seniors. The old experienced

workers

should be retained

instead

of replacing them. The employer

for instance

can offer a

job

with a bit different

job

scope

such

as a subunit supervisor with a lesser salary.

Further

, their working days can be reduced so that sufficient capital can be obtained to sustain the

industry

. Their experiences are priceless.

However

, labour-based

industry

on the other hand

warrants physical ability compared to experience. To illustrate

this

, let us take people working in the mine as an example. The skills are easily learned by,

moreover

, the physical ability of the young is far more required. The employer gains more benefits by replacing experienced but old

workers

with new and young yet inexperienced individuals. Apart, health is the major factor for the veteran's worker's replacement.

For example

, they succumbed to chronic illness. Their experiences

nevertheless

are meaningless.

Thus

, any termination of a

job

by the authority is fair and justified enough. The reality somehow is cruel indeed. An old person needs to be aware that his

job

is not secure anymore. In conclusion, when the time comes the old

workers

need to be replaced regardless of their experiences. Health issues are the main driving factor leading to

this

decision making.