Too much money is spent on looking after repairing old buildings. They should be knocked down and we should build modern instead. Do you agree or disagree?

There is a huge debate between
people
about whether a city council should protect the old estate. In fact, many city councils are spending a gigantic amount of
money
on fixing these estates, while there is a consensus among
people
that these assets should be reconstructed. Through the
next
,paragraphs I am going to illustrate why countries have to preserve these estates. Living in a world where
the
Correct article usage
apply
show examples
capital gain is vital, many countries strive to increase their revenue. There are various reasons why a country should allocate
money
from its budget to protect and maintain old towers.
Firstly
, if these assets are used wisely, a government generates a considerable amount of
money
.
Furthermore
, many travellers have the tendency to visit historical attractions.
For example
, many individuals want to visit South Korea because want to learn about their culture, history, and philosophy.
Also
,
this
means that
people
will spend their
money
on hotels, taxis, and restaurants, so by visiting these traditional attractions
people
will strengthen the economy. Many historians believe that policymakers have to come up with policies that could make rebuilding old
buildings
instead
of repairing them illegal. They said that governments must put preserving historical places on their fiscal policy, and the main reason for
this
is because these
buildings
are part of folklore. Old houses, streets, or even parks are conveying much information to the younger generation.
For instance
, many archaeologists have learned about many events from the old
buildings
.
Thus
, there is a consensus among historians that these estates might teach us about how
people
lived and their mindset. In conclusion, there are
people
that say that countries should allocate their budget on modernizing old
buildings
not maintaining old ones. I extremely think that policymakers have to protect traditional houses through fiscal policy, and
this
is because it might be useful economically and could teach youngsters about the heritage.
Submitted by kofaisal on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • Historical significance
  • Cultural heritage
  • Environmental impact
  • Sustainable
  • Cost-effective
  • Retrofit
  • Community sentiment
  • Public outcry
  • Urban aesthetics
  • Blend of architecture
  • Tourism attraction
  • Long-term economic benefits
  • Modern technologies and amenities
What to do next:
Look at other essays: