The gap between wealthy and unrich regions become a major problem.
Thus
, some less developed nations achieve cash as apply help from the richer, but the poverty is still not solved. So, some believe that the poor Linking Words
countries
should be given other kinds of help, outside financial aid. Personally, I agree with Use synonyms
this
idea because if money is only consumed for food and water, it cannot change people's development. Linking Words
Besides
, a teaching service is better than consumer funding.
To commence with, wealth cannot enhance the productivity of a community if it is used for daily consumption. Linking Words
For example
, Australia gives funds to South Africa, and the money is spent on food and water. Linking Words
Then
, Linking Words
this
situation would result in poverty again. So, Linking Words
this
is a useless way due to improving Linking Words
countries
economy.
Use synonyms
However
, if a rich country supports the poorer Linking Words
countries
with education services, folk in the latter Use synonyms
countries
will learn and improve their capabilities in order to increase their productivity. Use synonyms
For instance
, The UK arranges Chevening as a scholarship education program that supports poor students in some undeveloped state to study in The UK and force them to come back to their home and apply what they learnt for increasing their standard of living. Linking Words
Hence
, Linking Words
this
makes it clear that other types of help, Linking Words
such
as academic services, can change the poorer Linking Words
countries
significantly.
To sum up, I reiterate my opinion that money is not always changing conditions if people are not educated to use it wisely. Use synonyms
Furthermore
, other measures like learning opportunities can help communities to enhance their life. The better education humans get, the better life humans live.Linking Words