Some people think that the government should strictly control the supply of fresh water, as it is a limited resource, while others it should not be regulated. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.

It is irrefutable that

water

is the most valuable resource of our life. Some

people

believe that ministry should hard manage to provide fresh

water

. Others,

however

, are of the opinion that it is not a good idea. In the following

paragraphs

Add a comma

,paragraphs

show examples

I intend to delve into both variants and write my attitude about them. There are many benefits of controlling the snobbery of clean

water

by the

government

.

This

measure can significantly save

water

reserves and economize them. Every day

people

waste a giant amount of drinkable,

fresh

Correct your spelling

freshwater

show examples

water

. As we know,

water

is one of the limited resources of the earth. Many scientists say that global

water

storage is decreasing day by day and the consequences of

this

may be unfortunate.

Therefore

, the

government

can solve

this

issue through different measures like new laws about

water

wasting and limiting

water

usage.

Although

, the

second

viewpoint has

also

many advantages in other aspects. If the

government

does not regulate or limit the supply of

water

,

people

can improve and expand their businesses, because, most businesses are envious of

water

.

For example

, restaurants, leisure centres and etc.

Thus

, it can make it easier to conduct business.

Moreover

, poor

people

can not be worried about drinkable

water

.

Nevertheless

, it is necessary to take into account all the details of each individual case. To conclude, both views have certain benefits. In my opinion, even if the

government

does not control the

water

reserve, each of us must think about the future of our planet and take care of it.