Research has shown that overeating is as harmful as smoking. Therefore, the advertising of certain food products should be banned in the same way as the advertising of cigarettes in some countries. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

While I understand that critics may see

this

as an invasion of free enterprise, I would argue AGAINST

this

phenomenon much more than

support

Correct pronoun usage

itsupport

show examples

. I would argue that

this

holds

such

a compelling notion, and I personally

support

the idea of banning

food

publication. It is undeniable that the prohibition of some

food

products promotion helps tackle a few health problems,

for example

, obesity is a big threat to the young generation. TV advertising gives foodies more opportunities to keep them posted with the latest

food

products.

This

means that people tend to try new flavours and sometimes, they buy much more than they really need.

As a result

, they might get too much sugar and oil to get obese. What’s more, obesity might lead to other diseases, especially heart attacks.

For example

, forbidding Tim Tam biscuits contains a great amount of sugar which more likely helps to solve these problems.

However

,

although

overeating can truly affect our health, there is no evidence to show that the promotion of foods can cause

food

addiction since customers' choices are unchangeable due to advertising. As a matter of fact, a gato looks so scrumptious but foodies who hate sweets

,

Remove the comma

apply

show examples

might never consider buying it in the

first

place.

Additionally

, people have their own choice about their favourite

food

. Overeating any kind of

food

can

also

impact our bodies but

this

is not a reason to ban all promotions of foods. In conclusion, it is understandable why some may

support

food

product advertising bans.

However

, I cannot

support

such

a view given the aforementioned reasons.