It is weened by many
that nations should put some
on foreign
and production
to ensure the protection of local
which is certainly good for every nation. I vehemently espouse that
on foreign
to protect local
by
is really very conducive in order to save the employment of many locals and
a Remove the article
show examples
protection from
technologicalAdd an article
the technological
a technological
show examples
difference. As these points require prudent elaboration, let us delve deeper into them with pertinent examples in the impending paragraphs.
with, a large number of
are in favour of putting
on foreign
to save local
because there are numerous reasons behind
.
and foremost, since foreign
come up with new methods of
productionsFix the agreement mistake
show examples
, these can create an issue of unemployment for local
. To elaborate, because foreign
companiesChange noun form
show examples
and factories can depend more on
than humans, local workers cannot be able to get jobs in these new
.
, not only do
working in the local
face low wage
rateFix the agreement mistake
show examples
,Remove the comma
show examples
but
other workers can certainly be unemployed in
newAdd an article
show examples
system of foreign
so
forAdd the comma(s)
show examples
the welfare of
,
should restrict foreign
. To cite an example,
Ms.Change the punctuation
show examples
Katharine Viner, the editor-in-chief of The Guardian newspaper in her editorial ‘Negative effects of foreign
on the nations’ in May
,Remove the comma
show examples
2016 clearly unveiled that many
from local
had lost their jobs when foreign
started their production with
newAdd an article
show examples
method in many nations due to absence of
on foreign
.
, as long as foreign
without any restriction from
governmentAdd an article
show examples
can use
Add an article
show examples
updateWrong verb form
show examples
to date technology, local
cannot compete
Change preposition
show examples
them Correct pronoun usage
show examples
with
hugeAdd an article
show examples
technological
differenceFix the agreement mistake
show examples
. To explain, when foreign
show up with hi-tech technology, it is a major threat for local
and ultimately without restriction from
governmentsCorrect article usage
show examples
side can increase more
harmsFix the agreement mistake
show examples
. As a consequence, after
on foreign
beChange the verb form
show examples
it
factoryFix the agreement mistake
show examples
or
, local
businessFix the agreement mistake
show examples
may not have any fear of technological changes and they feel safe and protected. To exemplify,
a Remove the article
show examples
painstaking research conducted by Oxford University, over a group of 1500 local
personnel ranging from 20 to 45 years old in March 2017 manifestly revealed that 85 % of them accepted that
over foreign
factories in the nation
wasChange the verb form
show examples
a Remove the article
show examples
necessary protection as local
were not able to
competeCorrect your spelling
show examples
them with existing
low levelAdd a hyphen
show examples
technology.
To encapsulate, it can unequivocally be concluded that it is necessary to protect local
by restricting foreign
companiesChange noun form
show examples
and factories from the
of numerous nations as it is beneficial for local
. I strongly believe that a restrictive environment for foreign
from countries to protect local
is nowhere harmful in the form of
to protectChange the verb form
show examples
locals from unemployment as well as
Add an article
show examples
safeguardWrong verb form
show examples
Correct pronoun usage
show examples
forChange preposition
show examples
technological issues.