Some governments spend a lot of public money training individuals to be successful in international sporting events. Some people believe that this money should be spent on things that will benefit the general public instead. To what extent do you agree or disagree ?

In
this
present-day world, it has to be said that the officialdom has to spend public funds for public rather than
sports
training for international games.I think that
this
is the most debated topic of all time.
Sports
can bring developments and economical growth in a
country
,
however
,basic needs like shelter,
transportation
and
food
are more important than
sports
.
This
essay will enunciate my agreement in detail with appropriate instances. To commence with, it is indeed an irrefutable fact that public needs
such
as housing,
transportation
,
food
and other essential things are very important for a healthy society.
Firstly
, a wealthy
country
is a result of healthy public.
Secondly
,
transportation
is very salient for day to day activities
such
as going to jobs,shopping, medical care and trades.
Thirdly
,due to overpopulation, the officialdom has to work on farming and new agricultural methods;
otherwise
, it may lead to over-dependency on other countries for
food
with huge tax and pay;that may lead to poverty.
For instance
, a seminal
study
was conducted by scholars of Harvard University about the importance of inventing new agricultural methods in Europe.The result shows about 90% of the need for new strategies for inventing a new method for increasing the population.In the light of
this
study
, the agricultural department of Europe has been decided to think about new techniques. To continue, it is paramount to consider the
country
's
development
instead
of spending a lot of money on
sports
training for international play games.To explicate
further
, the
development
is coming from basic improvements: shelters,
transportation
and
food
as mentioned above in the
first
paragraph;it is only the tip of the iceberg.
For instance
, a
study
was conducted by Toronto University about economical
development
and how we can understand a
country
is economically good.The result shows about 80% of
development
in
transportation
,80% accounted for
food
and shelter with 90% meaning that a
country
has developed.In the light of
this
study
, the officialdom had changed the requirements for identifying a developed or wealthy
country
. In conclusion, it has finalised that the government has to spend public funds for basic needs or beneficial things for the public rather than spend money for
sports
training.
Submitted by mariyatresavarghese on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: