Everybody should donate a fixed amount of their income to support charity. How far do you share this viewpoint?

For many people, all citizens should contribute a settled amount of their wages to society for donations because there is a large number of those who need financial support. It seems to me that the sheer cost of living, deviating from the intended goal makes

this

an impractical aspiration, and I will explain why in

this

essay.

Firstly

, the main obstacle would appear to be the

number of

Correct quantifier usage

apply

show examples

the

Correct article usage

apply

show examples

middle class which

cover

Correct subject-verb agreement

covers

show examples

approximately half of the

world

Change noun form

world's

show examples

population of those who are living on a budget

Correct word choice

and would

show examples

would

Verb problem

can

show examples

barely afford their own needs. The finance charge on employers becomes unacceptably high,

as well as

this

may increase the expense of living;

hence

, it could be impossible for those donating money. A second negative factor is the whole question of recipients. By

this

, we mean that the donation is supposed to be received, which may not be able to reach the person.

For example

, the money collected may be used to build or disappear in the middle, and there may even be some who are able to escape.

On the other hand

, it is true that those who argue that contributing to charity is a worthy ambition for society to have. Despite

this

,

this

aspiration suffers significantly when confronted with financial reality.

To conclude

, poverty, the probability of not adhering is the major cause of donating earnings to charity.

This

is not to say that

this

needs to be supplemented

at

Change preposition

with

show examples

various types,

such

as blood donation or even

donate

Wrong verb form

donating

show examples

old goods.