Government should invest more on science education rather than other subjects to develop the country . To what extent do you agree or disagree for this statement
It is argued that government funding for
education
should give preference to science
-based subjects over others, in an attempt to help boost a countries
future development and progress.To some extent, I agree that Change noun form
country's
science
education
is desirable but I also
feel that non-scientific disciplines must be included.I abbrobate
myself with Correct your spelling
abrogate
this
assertion upto
higher extent and the pertinent notions will be explicated Correct your spelling
up to
further
The primary reason for investing fund
in Fix the agreement mistake
funds
science
is that the advent of modern science
has brought a
numerous improvements to the way that countries and societies function. Increased electrical and Correct the article-noun agreement
apply
computer based
technologies have improved to much more work on efficient workplaces. Add a hyphen
computer-based
For example
, sources of renewable energy, such
as solar and wind generated
power, are beginning to help ease the planet’s reliance on fossil fuels. In Add a hyphen
wind-generated
this
era
people can understand the predictions of Add a comma
,era
weatherforcasting
and our universal system with the help of scientific tools. Correct your spelling
weather forecasting
Second
, science
education
is required for a variety of occupations, including physicist, medical scientist, and others. People cannot acquire these kinds of positions without a science
-based understanding, which helps produce greater economic value
Non-scientific topics, on the other hand
, are in my opinion, just as essential as science
education
. The first
argument is that topics like arts and history are critical in assisting pupils in gaining a broad understanding of the world and developing into well rounded
individuals. Add a hyphen
well-rounded
For example
, arts encourage students to be more creative and confident in their expression, which cannot be achieved just via math and science
. In addition
to the reasons stated above, I feel that ignoring these issues may result in an imbalance in the distribution of the nation's labour. A country cannot progress only on the basis of science
while the other aspects are neglected.
To summarise, while the government must financially support science
education
, I do not believe that a nation's economy can be improved if the other components are ignored. It is necessary for equitable growth, that the government looks into all the aspects for the nation to prosper.Submitted by harishnag8167 on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
Ultimate Speaking practice for IELTS
Practice speaking step by step, answer real-life questions, and build your confidence. Start your free trial and improve your speaking skills today!