The precedence of renewable resources
such
as extensive use of pure drink which was always a hotly debatable topic has now become more controversial with many people claiming that it is beneficial to make crucial decisions to protect the demand and supply of
rain
. While critics reject
this
notion and argue that
rain
is a natural resource and should be available free of cost and without any law. In my, opinion the former proposition appears to be more rational.
This
essay will
further
elaborate my views for favouring the positive impact of regulation in line to control
rain
consumption and
thus
will lead to a logical conclusion.
To commence with the
first
notion there are myriad things to be shared in its favour but the most preponderant one stems from the fact that H2O is rapidly evaporated from the earth due to global warming
moreover
, extensively wastage of pure
aqua
for plethora reasons
such
as tap
rain
for household chaos is lead to an alarming situation ,
therefore
, there is a need to monitor and establish laws and regulation to strongly restrict the consumption of fine
rain
by international communities. Another pilotable aspect of
this
trend is that some parts of countries are unable to access even the contaminated
aqua
such
as Africa where millions of people died each year due to inadequate
aqua
supply, in ,addition many parts of countries
such
as Pakistan ,particularly in Karachi where pure drink water has rapidly vanished and pure water is sold in a bucket.
in addition
there is research that in 2050, water resources are adversely shrinking but
also
dried out from our planet,
therefore
we need Adhoc measurements to combat the limited drink source.
Moving towards the
second
argument of
this
debate the
first
point of issue is that critics believed that
aqua
is a natural resource and should be available to the wider public without any charge and administrator interventions. For ,instance it is the core resource for living in the world and every mankind has the free-fall right to consume it.
Furthermore
, it’s the responsibility of a government to provide a natural source to their nations on a large scale by regulating
aqua
sources supply will lead to a sense of imbalance and other adverse results.
To recapitulate according to the arguments mentioned above one can reach a conclusion that the benefits of protecting natural resources
such
as
rain
and air are an integral part to survive on earth
therefore
governments and individuals need to go hand in hand to preserve the pure
rain
. in my, opinion there should be rules and regulations for
rain
supply in order to save it from vanishing.