The precedence of renewable resources
as extensive use of pure drink which was always a hotly debatable topic has now become more controversial with many people claiming that it is beneficial to make crucial decisions to protect the demand and supply of
. While critics reject
notion and argue that
is a natural resource and should be available free of cost and without any law. In my, opinion the former proposition appears to be more rational.
essay will
elaborate my views for favouring the positive impact of regulation in line to control
consumption and
will lead to a logical conclusion.
To commence with the
notion there are myriad things to be shared in its favour but the most preponderant one stems from the fact that H2O is rapidly evaporated from the earth due to global warming
, extensively wastage of pure
for plethora reasons
as tap
for household chaos is lead to an alarming situation ,
, there is a need to monitor and establish laws and regulation to strongly restrict the consumption of fine
by international communities. Another pilotable aspect of
trend is that some parts of countries are unable to access even the contaminated
as Africa where millions of people died each year due to inadequate
supply, in ,addition many parts of countries
as Pakistan ,particularly in Karachi where pure drink water has rapidly vanished and pure water is sold in a bucket.
there is research that in 2050, water resources are adversely shrinking but
dried out from our planet,
we need Adhoc measurements to combat the limited drink source.
Moving towards the
argument of
debate the
point of issue is that critics believed that
is a natural resource and should be available to the wider public without any charge and administrator interventions. For ,instance it is the core resource for living in the world and every mankind has the free-fall right to consume it.
, it’s the responsibility of a government to provide a natural source to their nations on a large scale by regulating
sources supply will lead to a sense of imbalance and other adverse results.
To recapitulate according to the arguments mentioned above one can reach a conclusion that the benefits of protecting natural resources
as
and air are an integral part to survive on earth
governments and individuals need to go hand in hand to preserve the pure
. in my, opinion there should be rules and regulations for
supply in order to save it from vanishing.