Some people think that the government should strictly control the supply of fresh water, as it is a limited resource, while others it should not be regulated. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.

The precedence of renewable resources
such
as extensive use of pure drink which was always a hotly debatable topic has now become more controversial with many people claiming that it is beneficial to make crucial decisions to protect the demand and supply of
rain
. While critics reject
this
notion and argue that
rain
is a natural resource and should be available free of cost and without any law. In my, opinion the former proposition appears to be more rational.
This
essay will
further
elaborate my views for favouring the positive impact of regulation in line to control
rain
consumption and
thus
will lead to a logical conclusion. To commence with the
first
notion there are myriad things to be shared in its favour but the most preponderant one stems from the fact that H2O is rapidly evaporated from the earth due to global warming
moreover
, extensively wastage of pure
aqua
for plethora reasons
such
as tap
rain
for household chaos is lead to an alarming situation ,
therefore
, there is a need to monitor and establish laws and regulation to strongly restrict the consumption of fine
rain
by international communities. Another pilotable aspect of
this
trend is that some parts of countries are unable to access even the contaminated
aqua
such
as Africa where millions of people died each year due to inadequate
aqua
supply, in ,addition many parts of countries
such
as Pakistan ,particularly in Karachi where pure drink water has rapidly vanished and pure water is sold in a bucket.
in addition
there is research that in 2050, water resources are adversely shrinking but
also
dried out from our planet,
therefore
we need Adhoc measurements to combat the limited drink source. Moving towards the
second
argument of
this
debate the
first
point of issue is that critics believed that
aqua
is a natural resource and should be available to the wider public without any charge and administrator interventions. For ,instance it is the core resource for living in the world and every mankind has the free-fall right to consume it.
Furthermore
, it’s the responsibility of a government to provide a natural source to their nations on a large scale by regulating
aqua
sources supply will lead to a sense of imbalance and other adverse results. To recapitulate according to the arguments mentioned above one can reach a conclusion that the benefits of protecting natural resources
such
as
rain
and air are an integral part to survive on earth
therefore
governments and individuals need to go hand in hand to preserve the pure
rain
. in my, opinion there should be rules and regulations for
rain
supply in order to save it from vanishing.
Submitted by Shabanraza489 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Word Count

IELTS says that you should write a minimum of 250 words in writing task 2. If you go under word count you will lose marks in task response.

A very long essay will not give you a higher band score.

Aim for between 260 to 290 words in writing task 2. This will ensure a concise essay and will be realistic in terms of time management. You have only 40 minutes to write the essay and you need around 10 minutes of planning time, so you will not be able to write a long essay in 30 minutes.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • limited resource
  • manage responsibly
  • shortages
  • environmental impact
  • over-extraction
  • wastage
  • quotas
  • pricing structures
  • efficient use
  • bureaucratic red tape
  • market mechanisms
  • competition, innovation, and investment
What to do next:
Look at other essays: