Some people think that the best way to solve global environment problems is to increase the cost of fuel. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

The world has been experiencing environmental issues including climate change. To solve these problems, some

people

argue that the prices of

fuel

should be higher while others suggest increasing the

cost

of

fuel

is not a solution. In

this

essay, I will discuss why raising the

cost

of

fuel

is not the most useful way.

To begin

with, when the oil becomes more expensive, nature would benefit.

First

of all, there will be reduced pollution. It is well-known that fossil fuels are the major contributors to environmental degradation. If the price of

fuel

gets higher,

people

would reduce the usage of

fuel

, thereby mitigating the harmful effects on the environment.

Second

of all, scientists would be encouraged to invent more sustainable technologies.

For instance

, governments would allocate more resources to research and technologies so that scientists could come up with environmental-friendly technologies.

On the other hand

, some issues can be caused by an increase in the

cost

of

fuel

.

Firstly

, living costs would

also

rise. There will be so many

people

struggling financially because they can not afford basic necessities

such

as grocery shopping

as a result

of spending most of their money on

fuel

.

Secondly

, societal progress would be delayed. Residents would try to cut down on

traveling

Change the spelling

travelling

show examples

. Unless it is really necessary to travel,

people

would stay home and work at home, which will result in low productivity. To sum up, a rise in the

cost

of

fuel

would produce both beneficial and negative outcomes for

people

.

However

, given that detrimental implications take precedence over positive ramifications, I strongly believe that increasing the

fuel

cost

would not be a good idea to limit the impacts of

fuel

.