In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport. Discuss both these views and give your opinion.

In many nations, some argue a large amount of
money
should be allocated to build new
railway
lines
while others indicate improving the current public transport is a better option. In
this
essay, I will discuss
both
views and argue that constructing a transportation system is preferable.
To begin
with, constructing new tracks for very fast trains between cities entails
both
positive and negative outcomes.
First
of all, when fast tracks are
finally
built, the hours spent by commuters going to work from their place should be reduced and productivity would increase.
For instance
, they can work more effectively and take a better rest in lieu of spending their
time
meaninglessly on trains.
In contrast
, making new
railway
lines
would require a plethora of
money
and
time
, which means governments should make a sacrifice for other public services
such
as public education.
Similarly
, renovating pre-existing public transport engenders
both
beneficial and detrimental implications. As opposed to creating new
railway
lines
, it would not require as much
time
or
money
, which means governments need to spend
money
only on fixing or replacing some parts of railways.
However
, existing transportation systems will have to be replaced by new ones in the future as they will be obsolete and outdated. To replace old and malfunctioning tracks, a countless amount of
money
and
time
will be necessary. To sum up,
both
the construction of new
railway
lines
and the renovation of existing transport systems bring about
both
benign and malign effects.
However
, given that the harmful effect caused by updating the current system outweighs the one by building new ones, I believe
money
should be allocated to build new
railway
lines
.
Submitted by narsysos on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • infrastructure
  • efficient
  • congestion
  • sustainable
  • environmentally friendly
  • connectivity
  • economic growth
  • public transportation
What to do next:
Look at other essays: