Due to people immigrating from rural areas into metropolitan areas, the need for accommodation will be increased compared to the past.
Consequently
, most governments for providing more houses because of the lack of empty land in an urban district turn to destroying green lands in the vicinity of urban areas. Linking Words
This
action will have numerous destructive environmental and city effects, as expressed below.
The Linking Words
first
argument concerns the rising population in a city; it causes a significant problem Linking Words
such
as overpopulation. One of its effects is the lack of employment in the bustling city. Linking Words
Thus
, some people cannot afford living expenses and may turn to shoplifting or robbing. Linking Words
In addition
, housing costs are considerably higher in most crowded cities because of housing shortages than in sparsely populated towns. Linking Words
Then
the rate of poverty and homelessness drastically rises, especially in poor districts.
A Linking Words
second
but equally important point highlights that when more population settles down in metropolis, more environmental problems will be created by swapping land use of green land for the residential area. Primarily, towns need more energy like electricity and gas to keep lights on and Linking Words
houses
warm, Change the verb form
house
therefore
directly escalating the greenhouse effect by using Linking Words
further
fossil fuels. Linking Words
Lastly
, the number of vehicles rises for people’s daily commute or transfers. As a consequence, the rate of cars producing emissions will significantly increase.
To conclude, substituting farmlands or parks with residential buildings to accommodate more people is not logical. Linking Words
Hence
, governments must struggle with crowding and environmental issues. As mentioned before, sprawling cities entail adding job opportunities Linking Words
besides
generating extra energy.Linking Words
moradipourmehrad