Some schools prefer to teach specialized subjects to students after the age of 15, while others suggest that all the subjects should be taught throughout school life. What are the benefits of these 2 approaches? Which one is better, in your opinion?

People have different options regarding the education system. While many nations argued that educational classification encourages scholarship in a certain way only after the age of 15. Whereas others considered that students should study all subjects during the school days.

This

essay will examine cases of

this

action and the forthcoming paragraphs will discuss both beneficial sides. On the one hand,the basic advantage of

this

action is that people can keep their time spending unnecessary lectures.

In other words

, if bachelors learned exact direction like science, art, medical and so on, they may concentrate their mind,as a

,

Remove the comma

apply

show examples

result students should reach their purpose like some kinds of goals.

For example

, I remember when I was a child, I studied at school which is adapted linguistic courses, especially English language.That's why nowadays I know more languages than those who studied in general universities. Turning off the other hands of argument, the main agreement of studying general departments is that you can learn lots of subjects and at the same time you have a chance to learn program which you love. Because, In traditional ,institutions you can find a wide range of lines and you may choose your favourite lesson according to your future interest.

Additionally

, scholars who studied past time academes their mind and outlook very convenient than those who studied spacial academy.

For instance

, In my home ,country people need to study previously systems after that they can choose their secondary academies. In conclusion, I support both sides of

this

statement. I think those types of educational methods have their usage places.