Some countries today have passed laws against smoking tobacco in public buildings such as offices and restaurants. Other countries have no intention of doing this. Consider the possible arguments on both sides of this debate, and reach your own conclusion on which side you favor.

In many countries around the world, the legal prohibition against

tobacco

smoking has been enacted successfully.

However

, several other countries have not introduced

the

Correct article usage

apply

show examples

official restrictions as of today for multiple reasons, which will be discussed

further

in

this

essay. On the one hand, those who oppose the implementation of smoking restrictions in public

places

share the view that these measures can be

non-effective

Correct your spelling

ineffective

show examples

in terms of reducing the frequency of second-hand

smoke

. In fact, they tend to highlight

Correct word choice

apply

show examples

that

Correct word choice

apply

show examples

the additional cost of building special “smoking areas” in public

places

is added

Verb problem

apply

show examples

, which has been the case in many instances.

Furthermore

, the critics of the smoking laws claim that banning indoor

tobacco

smoking can exacerbate

the

Correct article usage

apply

show examples

environmental pollution, as

the

Correct article usage

apply

show examples

smokers might continue to

smoke

outside of

the

Correct article usage

apply

show examples

public

places

, hospitals, or even educational institutes and pollute these areas with

smoke

and

cigarettes

Change the noun form

cigarette

show examples

butts.

In contrast

, the supporters of the smoking ban often point to the positive changes, of which the inhibitions could undermine the exposure to second-hand

smoke

. In

such

cases, the nonsmokers and the vulnerable group consisting of pregnant, young, or elderly who are unable to tolerate the hazardous exposure can substantially benefit from the

smoke

-free environment.

Moreover

, the critics of

tobacco

smoking

also

highlight that these restrictions can

further

ameliorate public awareness about the negativity of

tobacco

smoking. If the government could pass definitive legislation against smoking in public spaces, it is believed that

,

Remove the comma

apply

show examples

this

would promote the unacceptability of smoking,

thus

encouraging more people to quit smoking.

Overall

, I would support the proponents of the smoking ban in public

places

. It seems reasonable to legally inhibit

tobacco

smoking in public spaces to mitigate the detrimental effects of second-hand

smoke

. The responsible entities should

further

enhance the execution of the legislation.