A government has a responsibility to its citizens to ensure their safety. Therefore, some people think that the government should increase spending on defense but spend less on social benefits. What extent do you agree.

Due to an increment in crime rates,

people

believe that government should spend more money on the security of

people

in the country

instead

of on social progress. In

this

essay, I will discuss my notes on

this

concern and provide my extent of agreement.

Firstly

, there is no doubt that crime zone has spread widely around the world.

Hence

, in that case, it has become vital for the government to provide safety to the population with new technologies and programmes.

For example

- putting CCTV cameras around bus stops, banks and other public areas provide a bit of relief to the public in case of any mishappening because somewhere these devices help a lot to catch the traitor.

Moreover

, employing more soldiers on borderlines and keeping more police patrolling in cities during the night times keeps a danger zone away which

also

helps

people

to function smoothly.

Secondly

, on other hand, social profits

such

as education, health sector and employment can not be neglected as compared to security. It has been said that unemployment is the cause of poverty which enables

people

to get an education.

Hence

, the young generation gets forced to commit crimes

such

as drug selling, murder, theft and so on.

However

,

this

can be controlled if free education can be provided to all

people

. To summarise, It is undeniable that safety acquires the

first

place but social developments can not be overlooked in any instance. So I believe, money should be spent on a balancing beam to keep all areas progressive.