Some feel that cities should be designed to be beautiful while others feel thier funtionality is more important. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.

Aesthetics design has become an important role in our society, especially in a

city

landscape. Some groups of people agree with that statement, but some others regard that their functionality is more worth it to be considered. I strongly recommend the importance of a design in the

city

, it can impact not only the shallow

city

scene but

also

more social aspects deeply and permanently.

Firstly

, having a low rate of unemployment or a constant growth of the economy does not equal a high-quality life. According to the statistics, the residents who live in nordic Europe have a higher happiness index than American or Chinese, whereas those countries have higher GDPs.

Furthermore

, it is possible to both have a well-designed and functional

city

,

such

as nordic Europe's esthetics. They offer adequate consideration for the disabled community but still maintain a decent appearance. In the contrast, there might have some negative sentiments. Generally, it needs a bunch of budgets to construct a beautiful

city

sight, which means it is not a reachable aim for every

city

.

Therefore

, building more practical infrastructures for their citizens is way more vital,

such

as the develop-cities and poor countries. To conclude, whether to pursue a decent

city

landscape or not, depends on different situations. Overall, I think it is meaningful for a

city

to be pleasant. It will affect people's spiritual life and

also

benefit mental health

that is

matter to our

furture

Correct your spelling

future

further

.