Some feel that cities should be designed to be beautiful while others feel thier funtionality is more important. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.

Recently, aesthetic design has been regarded as an important issue in our society, especially in a

city

landscape. Some groups of people agree with that statement, but some others think that their functionality is more worth it to be considered. I strongly approve of the importance of a design in the

city

, it can impact not only the shallow side of the

city

scene but

also

more social aspects deeply and permanently.

Firstly

, having a low rate of unemployment or a constant growth of the economy does not equal a high-quality life. According to the statistics, the residents who live in nordic Europe have a higher happiness index than American or Chinese, whereas those countries have higher GDPs.

Furthermore

, it is possible to both have a well-designed and functional

city

,

such

as Nordic Europe's esthetic lifestyle. They offer adequate consideration for the disabled community but still maintain a decent appearance.

In contrast

, there might be some negative sentiments. Generally, it needs a bunch of budgets to construct a beautiful

city

view, which means it is not a reachable aim for every

city

to implement.

Therefore

, governments tend to build more practical infrastructures for their citizens that are way more vital and to fill the realistic demands,

such

as the developed cities and poor countries. To conclude, whether to pursue a decent

city

landscape or not, depends on different situations. Overall, I think it is meant for an urban area to be vibrant. It will affect people's spiritual life and

also

benefit communities’ mental health which is utterly important for the long-term future.