Some people think that the government should strictly control the supply of fresh water, as it is a limited resource., while others it should not be regulated. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.

It is hard to deny that the waste of

freshwater

Correct your spelling

fresh water

show examples

is a common phenomenon worldwide, at the same time many people in poverty suffer from the leakage of

water

,

such

a fact leads to the arbitrary proposal that we should let the government control freshwater supplement rigidly.

However

,

such

a statement is nothing but a specious fallacy, and it should be examined meticulously. As far as developmental demands, individual contingency plans and feasibility are concerned, I strongly hold that the usage of

freshwater

Correct your spelling

fresh water

show examples

should not be controlled by the government.

First

and foremost, freshwater can be important for industrial development, as increasing the difficulty in freshwater usage hinders the improvement speed of productivity. The demand amount of

water

of each industry varies from their production routines, sometimes the requirement for

water

can alter largely when doing new research, innovations or facing accidents.

For instance

, nuclear power industries often require lots of

water

for cooling their equipment, the leakage of freshwater could cause dangerous exploding and its related awful outcomes, which strongly pollute the environment and contribute to the abundance of the industry and influenced areas.

Furthermore

, the fact that

water

can save lives sometimes indicates that citizens might need to adjust their

water

consumption according to some emergency situations. To be more specific, fire conflagration, natural disasters and sudden wars are all emergency situations that require a higher capability of both

water

supplement and

water

storage

comparing

Wrong verb form

compared

show examples

to daily life, which

are

Change the verb form

is

show examples

essential for people to survive these cruel and unpredictable circumstances. If the proposal of controlling freshwater was published, citizens could lose their lives because a lot more

water

beyond the control line is needed for the purpose of putting out a fire. These kinds of situations should be avoided by refusing

such

an arbitrary proposal. Admittedly, some

countries

suffer from freshwater insufficiency, which brings about people who support the proposal that authorities of some

countries

should stop the waste of

water

by imposing rules in their places in order to help regions lacking freshwater.

However

, the main problem of

this

proposal is the poor feasibility of transporting enough

water

to other

countries

. To be more specific, the

water

resources in one place largely depend on geographical facts like latitude, amount and height of mountains and the strength of sunlight.

Therefore

,

countries

with sufficient

water

resources are always far from

countries

with insufficient

water

.

For example

, most

countries

with poor amounts of precipitation are located in Africa, so it remains a problem to transfer enough

water

to these regions.

Instead

of these kinds of approaches, solutions like aiding nations in Africa with

water

purification devices and encouraging migrations for humanitarian purposes might be more helpful.