Many wild birds and animals live in towns and cities. Some people think that the wildlife should be protected. Some think that they should be removed. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

In

this

present day and age , there has been much discussion revolving around the issue of numerous wild creatures which are living in metropolia.

Consequently

, people are divided over whether these animals should be protected or not. In

this

essay , both convincing arguments will be discussed ,and

finally

, my opinion will be given. On the one hand , some opponents believe that preserving those wild birds and animals could bring a wide range of benefits not only to society but

also

to our mother earth .

Firstly

, these livings are best characterized in order to have a well-balanced ecosystem in which all organisms are living altogether.

For example

, according to the food chain , wild birds feed on insects and plants ,in turn , human beings have to rely on both of them.

Moreover

, people predicted natural disasters

such

as an earthquake or a storm by checking those creatures’ reactions.

In other words

, they played a fundamental role in the era when technology was not booming.

On the other hand

, some proponents assert that these organisms are useless and could bring devastating effects .

First

of all , the waste from them is basically hazardous to the health and can be detrimental . To prove with an illustration , there have been a lot of pigeons discrete on roads in cities , and as per research data , these disposals would be harmful ,especially to young children.

Accordingly

,

although

there can be undesirable health-related problems , in my view , these issues can be addressed in a sensible way. I believe that human being has the main responsibility to protect those wild livings which are essential to biodiversity.