In some countries, a few people earn extremely high salaries. Some people think that this is good for a country, while others believe that the government should control salaries and limit the amount people can earn. Discuss both sides and express your opinion.
Some nations are facing the problem of a huge pay gap among their citizens.
This
is because only a few earn significantly high wages, while
others struggle to make both
ends meet. High remuneration is believed to be good for a country by some people, Correct pronoun usage
apply
whereas
others think that salaries and the amount individuals earn should be controlled and limited by the authority
. In my opinion, in view of Fix the agreement mistake
authorities
prevention
of the brain drain of a country, stipends should not be controlled.
More innovation and inventions happen if there is no limit on the amount professionals can earn because money works as a motivational factor for many individuals. Correct article usage
the prevention
Moreover
, it also
facilitates reducing the migration of skilled professionals. For example
, a significant problem being faced by most Asian nations is that medical and IT experts move to developed ones such
as Canada, USA and Australia in order to get better salaries. Thus
, Asian countries are struggling to prevent the brain drain of intelligent and innovative people.
On the contrary
, there will be more equality among different societies, if there is no major pay gap. In addition
, when individuals are treated the same, Societies become more peaceful. For instance
, according to
a survey, Finland and Norway reserved their first place in the happiness index list because the people over there get the same amount of salary irrespective of the type of profession. Furthermore
, the authorities in these countries set the minimum wage for each type of occupation.
In conclusion, it is evident that each model has its own advantages and disadvantages. Controlling the remuneration results in the brain drain of a country. In contrast
, there will be more equality if the government cap the stipend. Having said that, in my view, the government should not limit the
salaries in order to encourage innovation and creativity.Correct article usage
apply
Submitted by gurpreetmann1994 on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
coherence cohesion
Ensure the introduction clearly introduces the topic and provides a clear thesis statement that outlines the main points to be discussed in the essay.
coherence cohesion
Include a more comprehensive conclusion that summarizes the main points and restates your opinion clearly.