Doing an enjoyable activity with a child can develop better skills and imagination than reading. To what extent do you agree? Use reasons and specific examples to explain your answer.

Playing and spending some

time

with children are considered to be contributing factors to their abilities rather than studying. While

this

approach can be proved beneficial up to some extent,

this

is far from being the best method. There is no doubt that for some people, evolving with a

child

in their playing activity makes them happy,

as a

result

Add a comma

,result

show examples

their cognitive sense will be more enhanced.

For example

, research shows that children whose parents are more involved with them are good at sports.

Moreover

, kids who tend to enjoy more of their

time

with the family have grown out to be more successful people, as during childhood they gain lots of skilful traits from their descent. For these reasons, playful

time

with a

child

cannot be ignored.

However

, there is no guarantee that mixing up with children led to better skills in future, while they

also

need to spend some of their valuable

time

at school.

First

of all, a

child

needs to give some of their

time

studying as well, as

this

will help them to develop their future prospects. To illustrate, to find a job in the coming future one should study and get a valuable degree as well.

Similarly

, students who are good at studying are generally happy, whilst they will have more jobs, money and many other opportunities.

Thus

, the education of a

child

cannot be boycotted. To sum up all of the above statements, despite the potential ways in which involvement with a

child

helps them to grow their complex ways of thinking, I believed that it cannot be assumed it is the best way as there is an old traditional method of reading to do so.