the death penalty is the best way to control and reduce serious crime. to what extent do you agree

Capital punishment is the top method to prevent and decrease important offences. I would argue that ı would argue that innocent people wrongly convicted might be killed, the

death

penalty

does not effectively reduce the

crime

rate,

there

Correct word choice

and there

show examples

is no pain-free way to kill anyone. On the one hand, the

death

penalty

deters criminals from contemplating a

crime

. İn addition, ıt sends a clear message that offence is morally wrong.

Moreover

, it eliminates the possibility of guilties re-offending.

On the other hand

, there might become more benefits to being against the

death

penalty

.

Firstly

, innocent people wrongly convicted might be killed.

For example

, Kevin Strickland was exonerated after 43 years in one of the longest confirmed wrongful-conviction cases in U.S. history. There was one untrustworthy person as a witness. She later attempted multiple times to retract her testimony because she said she was pressured by police. He was released from prison in the end.

Furthermore

, If he had been sentenced to

death

, he could have been killed.

Secondly

, the

death

penalty

does not effectively reduce the

crime

rate. There are many pieces of research about

this

issue that states that have

death

penalty

laws do not have lower

crime

rates or murder rates than states without

such

laws.

Thirdly

, there is no pain-free way to kill anyone. İn conclusion, while I acknowledge that the

death

penalty

deters criminals from contemplating a

crime

ı would argue that innocent people wrongly convicted might be killed, the

death

penalty

does not effectively reduce the

crime

rate, there is no pain-free way to kill anyone.