Some people think that resources should be spent on protecting wild animals, while others think those would be better used for the human population. Discuss both sides and give your own opinion.
It is considered by some that wildlife should be protected by spending
resources
on them whereas others seem to believe that the human population deserves more. This
essay will scrutinize the justifications behind the two contrasting perspectives before the conclusion of why my position lies on the former statement is reached.
On one hand, as most wild animals
are threatened by human activities, they should be seriously conserved. This
is because animals
do not have the ability to protect themselves from man-made threats, it is our responsibility to compensate them by spending resources
on their protection. For example
, the construction of factories poses damage to animals
' habitats, as well as the ecosystem, contributing to the massive death of susceptible species. As a result
, related resources
, such
as abundant forests, should be converted into their new habitats to prevent the extinction of some wild animals
.
On the other hand
, the human population is alarmingly increasing over the period, so resources
are required in order to support their living conditions. To explain, when the population explodes, it means that more accommodations, food supplies, and other resources
are in need to guarantee their fundamental needs. For instance
, more residential areas are necessarily built to accommodate the projected total of residents, at the expense of natural sites. This
proves that resources
should be distributed more to improve the standard of living of humanity instead
of over-concerning about
wildlife.
In conclusion, taking both aspects into consideration, I am inclined to believe Change preposition
apply
that wild
Change the determiner
that wild animal
those wild animals
animals
are dependent on humanity to spend resources
on their protection rather than spending on humans themselves. If the related authorities could effectively control the destructive human activities which affect animals
in the first
place, there is no need to worry about protecting wildlife as much as in the present.Submitted by chachapanisara on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.