Many would argue that scientific research requires a degree of oversight from the relevant governmental authorities. In my opinion, properly handled, this is a sensible and necessary policy. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this?

Supervision of responsible authorities on significant research like scientific one has been always debated. While some people do not agree with
this
policy, I do believe that researchers with the help of these rules are able to improve their ideas which leads to more acceptable consequences. On the one hand, there are some logical reasons indicating the merits of
this
approach.
To begin
with, if a project is under a state-owned company, its cost will probably be supplied by the government.
As a result
, scientists can provide facilities like new experimental instruments which bring about better investigations.
Next
, with the protection from authorities and their consideration, serious information gained from experiments will not be reachable so it is the best way to keep results safe.
For example
, during my study at university for a master’s degree, my supervisor and I have to cooperate with military service on a vital project.
Although
I was not satisfied with
this
obligation, I must confess, that they always supported and provided advanced instruments for us.
Thus
, we did not have any issue bothering that resulted in a more accurate outcome.
On the other hand
, some people are of negative opinion. In the beginning, these individuals believe that monitoring during the investigation can decline their freedom.
Therefore
, they hold the perception that imposed restrictions definitely damage their self-esteem.
In addition
, in these circumstances, scholars have to work with some colleagues who are unknown, so they may not feel pleasant which has undesirable repercussions. To summarize, it is generally known that any researcher being under the control of a specific organization can have numerous benefits
in contrast
to its drawbacks. I have personally convinced that cooperation with a company or an organization especially in significant projects can lead to realistic results.
Submitted by vahidansari.science on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Improve your band scores without paying for expensive tutoring
Instantly see mistakes you've made and learn how to avoid them.

Support ideas with relevant, specific examples

Examples make your writing easier to understand by illustrating points more effectively.

Examples, if used properly, not only help you get higher marks for ‘Task Response’ but also for ‘Coherence’.

When giving examples it is best to put them after your main idea or topic sentence. They can be used in the middle of supporting sentences or they can be used to start a new sentence. There is no rule for where exactly to give examples in essays, logically they would come after your main idea/topic sentence or just after a supporting sentence.

Linking words for giving examples:

  • for example
  • for instance
  • to illustrate this
  • to give a clear example
  • such as
  • namely
  • to illustrate
  • take, for example

Read more in the eBook

The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »

* free ebook for Premium users

What to do next:
Look at other essays:
Improve your IELTS writing score within two weeks
Just type your IELTS essay and receive a clear, detailed report and band score in a moment.